There is a great need to have all the public procurement processes monitored by independent bodies. The main role of these monitoring bodies is to ensure that all the procurement done in the public sector are free and transparent to all the stakeholders involved. The fact that the monitoring bodies ought to offer unbiased services indicates that these bodies ought to be of high integrity and should not have any links with the firms to be monitored. As we shall shortly see, the need for monitoring public procurement processes is manifold.
First, monitoring the processes will guarantee the one fact that all the stakeholders in the tendering and the bidding processes are exposed to a transparent system. When there is no monitoring, chances are the outsourcing process could be set in a way that locks out certain vendors and this is inappropriate. Instances as this are not rare and that is why it is so crucial that procurements are monitored from start to end so that instances of corruption are mitigated or stopped altogether.
Oversight processes over the public procurement processes is also important since it ensures that there is equitable distribution of the opportunities to tender and supply for advertised services and products. Due to nepotism and other forms of corruption, all these opportunities can be channeled to only a group of people if there is no monitoring in place. monitoring, however, makes it possible for all people to access those opportunities and that those who win them are those who are rightly merited to do the supplies of the needed goods and services.
The other important reason for having oversight services for public procurements is to ensure that every allocation made is accounted for satisfactorily. Without having procurement monitoring in place, the staff involved with the outsourcing have a high chance of embezzling public funds and this may lead to inefficient service delivery to the public.
Planning for future projects is also impossible unless there is accountability in the public sector. The donors to the projects stand to make very informed decisions regarding which areas may need more allocations or which may need less in the future given the fact that the processes are transparent for them to make such judgements. They are also able to judge accurately on the set budgetary allocations so that there are no constraints for any sector.
Lastly, oversight over procurement processes ensures that the masses have confidence in the spending of such institutions. More often than not, the public is usually uncertain of the spending patterns in the governmental institutions. This skepticism can only be dispelled where there is an oversight over the procurement processes.
Why People Think Services Are A Good Idea
Short Course on Businesses – Getting to Square 1